Drug administration controller

ABSTRACT

A drug administration controller has a sensor that generates a sensor signal to a physiological measurement device, which measures a physiological parameter in response. A control output responsive to the physiological parameter or a metric derived from the physiological parameter causes a drug administration device to affect a treatment of a person, such as by initiating, pausing, halting or adjusting a dosage of drugs administered to the person.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/104,782, filed Nov. 25, 2020, entitled Drug Administration Controller, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/094,100, filed Apr. 8, 2016, entitled Drug Administration Controller, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/475,136, filed May 18, 2012, entitled Drug Administration Controller, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/654,904, filed Jan. 17, 2007, entitled Drug Administration Controller, which claims priority benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/759,673, filed Jan. 17, 2006, entitled Drug Administration Controller, and Ser. No. 60/764,946, filed Feb. 2, 2006, entitled Drug Administration Controller, all of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.

BACKGROUND

Physiological measurement systems employed in healthcare often feature visual and audible alarm mechanisms that alert a caregiver when a patient's vital signs are outside of predetermined limits. For example, a pulse oximeter, which measures the oxygen saturation level of arterial blood, indicates oxygen supply. A typical pulse oximetry system has a sensor that provides a signal output to a pulse oximeter monitor. The sensor has an emitter configured with both red and infrared LEDs that project light through a fleshy medium to a detector so as to determine the ratio of oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin light absorption. The monitor has a signal processor, a display and an alarm. The signal processor inputs the conditioned and digitized sensor signal and calculates oxygen saturation (SpO₂) along with pulse rate (PR), as is well-known in the art. The display provides a numerical readout of a patient's oxygen saturation and pulse rate. The alarm provides an audible indication when oxygen saturation or pulse rate are outside of predetermined limits.

Another pulse oximetry parameter is perfusion index (PI). PI is a measure of perfusion at the pulse oximetry sensor site comparing the pulsatile (AC) signal to the non-pulsatile (DC) signal, expressed as a percentage ratio. An example is the PI Delta Alarm™ feature of the Radical 7™ Pulse CO-Oximeter™ available from Masimo Corporation, Irvine, CA, which alerts clinicians to specified changes in PI. In particular, PI Delta indicates if PI at a monitored site decreases by a specific level (delta) over a specified window of time, with both variables selectable by the user within predetermined ranges.

Tracking a series of desaturations over time is one metric that is derived from SpO₂ that is well-known in the art. See, e.g., Farney, Robert J., Jensen, Robert L.; Ear Oximetry to Detect Apnea and Differentiate Rapid Eye Movement (REM) and Non-REM (NREM) Sleep: Screening for the Sleep Apnea Syndrome; Chest; April 1986; pages 533-539, incorporated by reference herein. Traditional high and low SpO₂ alarm limits alert clinicians to saturation levels that exceed user selected thresholds, and these thresholds are typically established at a considerable change from the patients' baseline saturation level. However, in select patient populations, substantial desaturation events that exceed a typical low alarm limit threshold may be preceded by a cycle of transient desaturations over a limited timeframe. The ability to alert clinicians to a cycle of these smaller desaturations provides an earlier indication of a potential significant decline in the patient's status and the need for more focused monitoring and/or a change in treatment. An example is the Desat Index Alarm™ feature of the Radical 7™, mentioned above, which enables clinicians to detect an increasing quantity of smaller desaturations that may precede declining respiratory status. Desat Index is a measure responsive to patients that experience a specific number of desaturations beyond a defined level from the patient's baseline saturation over a specific window of time, with each of these variables selectable by the user within predetermined ranges.

A physiological parameter that can be measured in addition to, or in lieu of, SpO₂ is respiration rate (RR). A respiration rate monitor utilizes a body sound sensor with piezoelectric membranes particularly suited for the capture of acoustic waves and the conversion thereof into electric signals. To detect body sound, the piezoelectric membranes are used as mechano-electric transducers that are temporarily polarized when subject to a physical force, such as when subjected to the mechanical stress caused by the acoustic waves coming from the inside of a patient's body. The body sound sensor is typically attached to the suprasternal notch or at the lateral neck near the pharynx so as to detect tracheal sounds. A sound sensor is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,661,161 entitled Piezoelectric Biological Sound Monitor With Printed Circuit Board, incorporated by reference herein. A respiration rate monitor is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/547,570 entitled Non-Invasive Monitoring of Respiratory Rate, Heart Rate and Apnea, incorporated by reference herein.

SUMMARY

Conventional patient monitors give insufficient advance warning of deteriorating patient health or the onset of a potentially serious physiological condition. Advantageously, a drug administration controller is responsive to one or more physiological parameters in addition to, or in lieu of, SpO₂ and PR, such as carboxyhemoglobin (HbCO), methemoglobin (HbMet), perfusion index (PI) and respiration rate (RR), to name a few. Further, a drug administration controller is advantageously responsive not only to preset parameter limits but also to various metrics derived from measured physiological parameters, such as trends, patterns and variability, alone or in combination, to name a few. As such, a drug administration controller is adapted to pausing or otherwise affecting drug administration based upon one or more physiological parameters and one or more metrics. Parameter variability is described with respect to PI in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/094,813 entitled Physiological Assessment System, incorporated by reference herein.

As an example, a drug administration controller may be responsive to changes in HbMet. Gaseous nitric oxide (NO) is increasingly recognized as an effective bacteriostatic or bacteriocidal agent. NO, however, can toxically increase HbMet.

A drug administration controller may be responsive to changes in perfusion index, such as measured by PI Delta, described above. PI may change dramatically in response to sympathetic changes in vasoconstriction or vasodilation of peripheral vessels caused by anesthesia or pain. For example, painful stimulus causes a significant decline of perfusion index.

As another example, a drug administration controller may be responsive to a cycle of transient desaturations over a limited timeframe, such as indicated by Desat Index, described above. Patients receiving pain medication may be predisposed to respiratory depression. If the patient has an underlying respiratory condition, pain medication may cause the patient to spiral into a cascade of cyclic desaturations, which initially are mild but may worsen quickly, leading to respiratory depression and even arrest.

As a further example, a drug administration controller may be responsive to respiration rate (RR) monitoring, as described above. RR provides an accurate marker for indicating acute respiratory dysfunction. For example, during conscious sedation, there is a risk of respiratory depression, and changes in RR typically provide an earlier warning than does pulse oximetry alone.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a general block diagram of a drug administration controller;

FIGS. 2A-C are illustrations of drug infusion controller embodiments;

FIGS. 3A-C are illustrations of medical gas controller embodiments;

FIG. 4 is a general block diagram of a parameter processor embodiment;

and

FIG. 5 is a detailed block diagram of a parameter processor embodiment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

FIG. 1 illustrates a drug administration controller 100 having one or more sensors 106 generating sensor signals 107 in response to physiological states of a living being, such as a patient 1. One or more physiological measurement devices 108 generate physiological parameter measurements 103 in response to the sensor Signals 107. A multiple parameter processor 101 processes the parameter measurements 103 alone or in combination and generates monitor or control outputs 102, or both, in response. In an open-loop configuration, one or more monitor outputs 102 are observed by a caregiver 2, who administers drugs or alters drug doses in response. Alternatively, or in addition to, the caregiver 2 initiates, pauses, halts or adjusts the settings of a drug administration device 104. In a closed-loop configuration, a drug administration device 104 is responsive to one or more control outputs 102 so as to affect the treatment of the patient 1, including initiating, pausing, halting or adjusting the dosage of administered drugs.

As shown in FIG. 1 , the drug administration device may be, as examples, a drug infusion device or a medical gas inhalation device. Closed loop drug infusion control is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/075,389, entitled Physiological Parameter Controller, incorporated by reference herein. Closed loop respirator control is described in U.S. Pat. App. No. 60/729,470 entitled Multi-Channel Pulse Oximetry Ventilator Control, incorporated by reference herein.

Also shown in FIG. 1 , sensors 106 may include an optical sensor attached to a tissue site, such as a fingertip, for measuring one or more blood parameters. Sensors 106 may also include blood pressure cuffs, ECG or EEG electrodes, CO₂ measuring capnography sensors and temperature sensors to name but a few. Corresponding physiological measurement devices 108 responsive to these sensors 106 may include blood parameter monitors, blood pressure monitors, capnometers, ECG and EEG monitors, as a few examples.

In one embodiment, sensors 106 include a pulse oximetry sensor, such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,782,757 entitled Low Noise Optical Probes and physiological measurement devices 108 include a pulse oximeter, such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,632,272 entitled Signal Processing Apparatus, both assigned to Masimo Corporation, Irvine, CA and both incorporated by reference herein. In another embodiment, sensors 106 and measurement devices 108 include a multiple wavelength sensor and a corresponding noninvasive blood parameter monitor, such as the RAD57™ and Radical7™ for measuring SpO₂, CO, HbMet, pulse rate, perfusion index and signal quality. The RAD-57 and Radical-7 are available from Masimo Corporation, Irvine, CA. In other embodiments, sensors 106 also include any of LNOP® adhesive or reusable sensors, SofTouch™ sensors, Hi-Fi Trauma™ or Blue™ sensor all available from Masimo Corporation, Irvine, CA. Further, measurement devices 108 also include any of Radical®, SatShare™, Rad-9™, Rad5™, Rad-5v™ or PPO+™ Masimo SET® pulse oximeters all available from Masimo Corporation, Irvine, CA.

In a particular embodiment, the control or monitor outputs 102 or both are responsive to a Desat Index or a PI Delta or both, as described above. In another particular embodiment, one or more of the measurement devices 108, the parameter processor 101 and the drug administrative device 104 are incorporated within a single unit. For example, the devices may be incorporated within a single housing, or the devices may be separately housed but physically and proximately connected.

Although sensors 106 are described above with respect to noninvasive technologies, sensors 106 may be invasive or noninvasive. Invasive measurements may require a person to prepare a blood or tissue sample, which is then processed by a physiological measurement device.

FIG. 2A illustrates a drug infusion controller embodiment 200 comprising a drug-infusion pump 204, an optical sensor 206 attached to a patient 1 and a noninvasive blood parameter monitor 208. The optical sensor 206 provides a sensor Signal via a sensor cable 207 to the blood parameter monitor 208. The blood parameter monitor 208 generates blood parameter measurements and processes those parameters to generate monitor and control outputs 203 (FIG. 1 ), as described in further detail with respect to FIGS. 4-5 , below. In particular, the blood parameter monitor 208 generates control signals via a control cable 202 to the drug-infusion pump 204, and the drug-infusion pump 204 administers drugs to the patient 1 via an IV 209, accordingly.

In one embodiment, the administered drug is a nitrate, such as sodium nitroprusside, and the blood parameter monitored is HbMet. In a particular embodiment, the blood parameter monitor 208 provides a control output according to one or more entries in TABLE 1. In another particular embodiment, the blood parameter monitor 208 provides a control output according to one or more entries in TABLE 2. In yet another embodiment, a blood parameter monitor 208 confirms that the measurement of HbMet is accurate, such as by checking a signal quality parameter or by having multiple sensors 206 on the patient 1.

FIG. 2B illustrates another drug infusion controller embodiment 201 comprising an optical sensor 206 and a combination blood-parameter monitor/drug infusion pump 205. In an embodiment, the drug infusion controller 200, 201 provides a visual display or audible alarm indicating various degrees of patient condition, such as green, yellow and red indicators or intermittent and low volume, medium volume and high volume tones.

TABLE 1 Rule Based Monitor Outputs RULE OUTPUT If HbMet > limit threshold disable pump; trigger alarm if HbMet > trend threshold disable pump; trigger alarm

TABLE 2 Rule-Based Monitor Outputs RULE OUTPUT If HbMet > limit threshold disable pump; trigger alarm if HbMet > trend threshold reduce dosage; activate caution indicator

Another embodiment involves patient controlled analgesia (PCA), i.e. the administered drug is an analgesia, and administration of the drug is controlled by the patient according to perceived pain levels. Analgesia administration, however, is paused in response to one or more blood parameters and corresponding metrics. In one embodiment, the blood parameter monitored is SpO₂ and the blood parameter monitor 208 provides a control output responsive to Desat Index. In a particular embodiment, PCA is paused or disabled according to TART

TABLE 3 Rule Based PCA Control Outputs RULE OUTPUT If Desat Index > index limit pause PCA for predetermined period; activate alarm

In another embodiment, the blood parameter monitor 208 provides a control output responsive to a PI indication of pain. In this manner, the administration of anesthesia is controlled according to the patient's perceived pain level. In a particular embodiment, PCA is paused or enabled according to one or more entries of TABLE 4, where a falling PI results in a negative PI Delta relative to an established baseline.

TABLE 4 Rule Based PCA Control Outputs RULE OUTPUT If PI Delta < delta limit enable PCA; activate caution indicator If PI Delta < delta limit disable PCA

FIG. 2C illustrates yet another drug infusion controller embodiment 211 having a piezoelectric sensor 216 and a combination blood-parameter/piezoelectric sound monitor/drug infusion pump 218. A piezoelectric sensor 216 is attached to a patient's body 1 so as to detect tracheal sounds. The corresponding sensor signal is transmitted to the sound monitor 218 via a sensor cable 217. The sound monitor/pump 218 generates biological sound measurements such as respiration rate (RR) and processes the measurements to generate control outputs. In a particular embodiment, the monitor/pump 218 provides a control output according to one or more entries of TABLE 5.

TABLE 5 Rule Based Monitor Outputs RULE OUTPUT If RR trend < trend threshold reduce dosage; activate caution indicator If RR < limit threshold disable pump; trigger alarm

FIG. 3A illustrates a medical gas controller embodiment 300 comprising a ventilator 304 adapted to supply both oxygen and a medical gas, an optical sensor 306 attached to a patient 1, and a noninvasive blood parameter monitor 308. The optical sensor 306 provides a sensor signal via a sensor cable 307 to the blood parameter monitor 308. The blood parameter monitor 308 generates blood parameter measurements and processes those parameters to generate monitor and control outputs, as described with respect to FIGS. 4-5 , below. In particular, the blood parameter monitor 308 generates control signals via a control cable 302 to the ventilator 304, and the ventilator 304 administers a medical gas to the patient 1 via a breathing apparatus 309 accordingly. FIG. 3B illustrates another medical gas controller embodiment 301 comprising an optical sensor 306 and a combination blood-parameter monitor/ventilator 305.

In one embodiment, the administered medical gas is a NO, and the blood parameter monitored is HbMet. In a particular embodiment, the blood parameter monitor 308 provides a control output according to one or more entries of TABLE 6. In another particular embodiment, the blood parameter monitor 308 provides a control output according to one or more entries of TABLE 7. In yet another embodiment, a blood parameter monitor 308 confirms that the measurement of HbMet is accurate, such as by checking a signal quality parameter or by having multiple sensors 306 on the patient 1. In a further embodiment, the administered medical gas is CO, and the blood parameter monitored is HbCO.

TABLE 6 Rule Based Monitor Outputs RULE OUTPUT If HbMet trend > trend threshold halt NO flow; trigger alarm If HbMet > limit threshold halt NO flow; trigger alarm

TABLE 7 Rule Based Monitor Outputs RULE OUTPUT If HbMet trend > trend threshold reduce NO flow; activate caution indicator If HbMet > limit threshold halt NO flow; trigger alarm

FIG. 3C illustrates yet another medical gas controller embodiment 311 comprising a piezoelectric sound sensor 316 and a combination blood parameter/piezoelectric sound monitor/ventilator 315. The sound sensor 316 is attached to a patient's body 1 so as to detect tracheal sounds and provides a sensor signal via a sensor cable 317 to the sound monitor 315. The sound monitor/ventilator 315 generates biological sound measurements such as respiration rate (RR) and provides control outputs responsive to RR. In a particular embodiment, the monitor/ventilator 315 provides a control output according to one or more entries of TABLE 8.

TABLE 8 Rule Based Monitor Outputs RULE OUTPUT If RR trend < trend threshold reduce medical gas flow; activate caution indicator If RR limit < limit threshold halt medical gas flow; trigger alarm

FIG. 4 illustrates a parameter processor 101, which may comprise an expert system, a neural-network or a logic circuit as examples. The parameter processor 101 has as inputs 103 one or more parameters from one or more physiological measurement devices 108 (FIG. 1 ). Noninvasive parameters may include oxygen saturation (SpO₂), pulse rate, perfusion index, HbCO, HbMet and other Hb species, and data confidence indicators, such as derived from a pulse oximeter or a Pulse Co-Oximeter™ (Masimo Corporation) to name a few. Invasive parameters may include lactate, glucose or other blood constituent measurements. Capnography parameters may include, for example, end tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO₂) and respiration rate. Other measurement parameters that can be input to the parameter processor 101 may include ECG, EEG, blood pressure and temperature to name a few. All of these parameters may indicate real-time measurements or historical data, such as would indicate a measurement trend. Pulse oximetry signal quality and data confidence indicators are described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,684,090 entitled Pulse Oximetry Data Confidence Indicator, assigned to Masimo Corporation, Irvine, CA and incorporated by reference herein.

As shown in FIG. 4 , monitor outputs 102 may be alarms. wellness indicators, controls and diagnostics. Alarms may be used to alert medical personnel to a potential urgent or emergency medical condition in a patient under their care. Wellness indicators may be used to inform medical personnel as to patient condition stability or instability, such as a less urgent but potentially deteriorating medical state or condition. Controls may be used to affect the operation of a medical treatment device or other medical-related equipment. Diagnostics may be messages or other indicators used to assist medical personnel in diagnosing or treating a patient condition.

User I/O 60, external devices 70 and wireless communication 80 also interface with the parameter processor 101 and provide communications to the outside world. User I/O 60 allows manual data entry and control. For example, a menu-driven operator display may be provided to allow entry of predetermined alarm thresholds. External devices 70 may include PCs and network interfaces to name a few.

FIG. 5 illustrates one embodiment of a parameter processor 101 having a pre-processor 510, a metric analyzer 520, a post-processor 530 and a controller 540. The pre-processor 510 has inputs 103 that may be real-time physiological parameter measurements, historical physiological parameter measurements, signal quality measures or any combination of the above. The pre-processor 510 generates metrics 512 that may include historical or real-time parameter trends, detected parameter patterns, parameter variability measures and signal quality indicators to name a few. As examples, trend metrics may indicate if a physiological parameter is increasing or decreasing at a certain rate over a certain time, pattern metrics may indicate if a parameter oscillates within a particular frequency range or over a particular time period, variability metrics may indicate the extent of parameter stability.

As shown in FIG. 5 , the metric analyzer 520 is configured to provide test results 522 to the post-processor based upon various rules applied to the metrics 512 in view of various thresholds 524. As an example, the metric analyzer 520 may output an alarm trigger 522 to the post-processor 530 when a parameter measurement 103 increases faster than a predetermined rate. This may be expressed by a rule that states “if trend metric exceeds trend threshold then trigger alarm.”

Also shown in FIG. 5 , the post processor 530 inputs test results 522 and generates outputs 102 including alarms, wellness indictors, controls and diagnostics. Alarms may be, for example, audible or visual alerts warning of critical conditions that need immediate attention. Wellness indicators may be audible or visual cues, such as an intermittent, low-volume tone or a red/yellow/green light indicating a patient with a stable or unstable physiological condition. Controls may be electrical or electronic, wired or wireless or mechanical outputs, to name a few, capable of interfacing with and affecting another device. As examples, controls 102 may interface with drug-infusion equipment or medical gas ventilation equipment, as described with respect to FIGS. 2A-C and 3A-C, above.

Further shown in FIG. 5 , the controller 540 interfaces with I/O 109, as described with respect to FIG. 4 , above. In one embodiment, the I/O 109 provides predetermined thresholds, which the controller 540 transmits to the metric analyzer 520. The controller 540 may also define metrics 514 for the pre-processor 510 and define outputs 534 for the post-processor 530.

A drug administration controller has been disclosed in detail in connection with various embodiments. These embodiments are disclosed by way of examples only and are not to limit the scope of the claims that follow. One of ordinary skill in art will appreciate many variations and modifications. 

1. (canceled)
 2. A drug administration method comprising: measuring a physiological parameter in response to a sensor attached to a patient; deriving a metric corresponding to the physiological parameter; and controlling a drug administration device based upon the metric, wherein the physiological parameter is at least one of: P1, RR, HbMet, or HbCO.
 3. The drug administration method according to claim 2, wherein the metric is a least one of: a parameter limit, a parameter trend, a parameter pattern, or a parameter variability.
 4. The drug administration method according to claim 3, wherein controlling comprises: enabling the drug administration device when P1 is trending downward as a marker of pain stimulus.
 5. The drug administration method according to claim 4, wherein controlling further comprises: pausing the drug administration device when P1 is not trending downward.
 6. The drug administration method according to claim 3, wherein controlling comprises: pausing the drug administration device when HbMet is trending upward.
 7. The drug administration method according to claim 3, wherein controlling comprises: pausing the drug administration device when HbMet is above HbMet limit.
 8. The drug administration method according to claim 3, wherein controlling comprises: pausing the drug administration device when RR is trending downward.
 9. The drug administration method according to claim 3, wherein controlling comprises: pausing the drug administration device when RR is less than a RR limit.
 10. A drug administration method comprising: measuring a physiological parameter in response to a sensor attached to a patient; deriving a metric corresponding to the physiological parameter; and controlling a drug administration device bases upon the metric, wherein the metric is at least one of: a parameter trend, a parameter pattern, or a parameter variability.
 11. The drug administration method according to claim 10, wherein the physiological parameter is at least one of: SpO₂, PR, P1, RR, HbMet, or HbCo.
 12. The drug administration method according to claim 11, wherein controlling comprises: enabling the drug administration device when P1 is trending downward.
 13. The drug administration method according to claim 11, wherein controlling comprises: pausing the drug administration device when HbMet is trending upward.
 14. The drug administration method according to claim 11, wherein controlling comprises: pausing the drug administration device when RR is trending downward.
 15. The drug administration method according to claim 11, wherein controlling comprises: pausing the drug administration device when a number of cyclical desaturations over a given timeframe is greater than a predetermined threshold.
 16. A drug administration controller comprising: at least one sensor that generates at least one sensor signal in response to a physiological state of a living being; at least one physiological measurement device that generates measurements of at least one physiological parameter in response to the at least one sensor signal; one or more processors that generate a control output in response to the measurements of the at least one physiological parameter; and a drug administration device responsive to one or more control outputs so as to affect a treatment of the living being including at least one of: initiating, pausing, halting, or adjusting a dosage of administered drugs.
 17. The drug administration controller according to claim 16, wherein the drug administration device is one of: a drug infusion device, or a medical gas inhalation device.
 18. The drug administration controller according to claim 17, wherein the at least one sensor comprises: an optical sensor attached to a tissue site so as to measure at least one blood parameter; and a sound sensor attached proximate to a neck site so as to measure respiration rate.
 19. The drug administration controller according to claim 18, wherein the at least one blood parameter comprises at least one of: HbMet or HbCO.
 20. The drug administration controller according to claim 19 further comprising: at least one metric derived from the at least one physiological parameter; and at least one rule relating the at least one metric to the control output. 